🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an observance that began as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has developed a corporate feel, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to address white audiences about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The surge has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since that time, focusing less on the histories of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is observed is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a elected representative gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. At the same time, far-right parties are surging in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the America, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to scrub African American heritage and narrative from the records is under way. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the month illustrates how little it can be effective if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the situation of the current era. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just eliminate events including Black History Month altogether, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an infrastructure that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and provides room for people, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has basic knowledge of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but confronted with the risks that face all if anti-racism is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.